<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Caretta Software Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog</link>
	<description>News and events about Caretta Software, GUI Design Studio, User Interface Design and Software Prototyping</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:46:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on GUI Design Studio 4.0 Released With New Interaction and Templates by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/gui-design-studio-4-0-released-with-new-interaction-and-templates/381/comment-page-1/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/?p=381#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>Ganesan, we don&#039;t currently have this functionality in the product though, interestingly, it was part of the original specification 8 years ago.

It&#039;s always been a potential feature but with low priority. We&#039;re currently trying to gauge how much demand there is for this kind of feature so that we can plan for it in future versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ganesan, we don&#8217;t currently have this functionality in the product though, interestingly, it was part of the original specification 8 years ago.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always been a potential feature but with low priority. We&#8217;re currently trying to gauge how much demand there is for this kind of feature so that we can plan for it in future versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GUI Design Studio 4.0 Released With New Interaction and Templates by Ganesan</title>
		<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/gui-design-studio-4-0-released-with-new-interaction-and-templates/381/comment-page-1/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganesan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 06:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/?p=381#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>I have some window based applications. I want to reverse the existing resource  file contents of these VC++ programs having the GUI elements and make a standard Professional looking one. Can I use GUI design studio to read these RC files, standardise their look and feel in your product and produce again the new rc THAT I can use with the VC++ source code again ? 

Thanks in advance. Kindly reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some window based applications. I want to reverse the existing resource  file contents of these VC++ programs having the GUI elements and make a standard Professional looking one. Can I use GUI design studio to read these RC files, standardise their look and feel in your product and produce again the new rc THAT I can use with the VC++ source code again ? </p>
<p>Thanks in advance. Kindly reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software Prototyping – Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve? by incremental prototyping</title>
		<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/software-prototyping-%e2%80%93-part-2-throw-away-or-evolve/175/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>incremental prototyping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/?p=175#comment-492</guid>
		<description>[...] has its own language. One example of this product speak is the term product champion. ManySoftware Prototyping Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve ...... the final, delivered application (or system) through incremental developments and changes. ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has its own language. One example of this product speak is the term product champion. ManySoftware Prototyping Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve &#8230;&#8230; the final, delivered application (or system) through incremental developments and changes. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GUI Design Studio 3.5 Released by UI Design</title>
		<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/gui-design-studio-3-5-released/196/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>UI Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/?p=196#comment-396</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s really a fantastic post ! added to my favourite blogs list.. I have been reading your blog last couple of weeks and enjoy every bit. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s really a fantastic post ! added to my favourite blogs list.. I have been reading your blog last couple of weeks and enjoy every bit. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GUI Design Studio 4.0 Preview &#8211; Part 2: Custom Elements and Templates by component design</title>
		<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/gui-design-studio-v4-preview-pt2-custom-elements-and-templates/334/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>component design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/?p=334#comment-353</guid>
		<description>[...] from Advanced Flash Components, which sells for $25. AFC is also the maker of UMapper, the firstGUI Design Studio 4.0 Preview Part 2: Custom Elements and ...If you change the original Component design, each instance of use in your project will also change. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Advanced Flash Components, which sells for $25. AFC is also the maker of UMapper, the firstGUI Design Studio 4.0 Preview Part 2: Custom Elements and &#8230;If you change the original Component design, each instance of use in your project will also change. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GUI Design Studio 3.6 Released With New Calendar Elements by john</title>
		<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/gui-design-studio-3-6-released-with-calendar-elements/285/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/?p=285#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Interesting software.  Great article.  Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting software.  Great article.  Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software Prototyping – Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve? by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/software-prototyping-%e2%80%93-part-2-throw-away-or-evolve/175/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/?p=175#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Justin.

Even with dedicated development resources and constraints on the architecture or tools (that will almost certainly be present once an application moves into actual implementation and beyond &#039;version 1&#039;), I think that the very nature of evolutionary development without some sort of up-front throw-away prototyping will miss opportunities for a better design.

Presenting and evaluating multiple alternatives can be very tricky when you&#039;re building them into the application itself whereas a lot can be explored and learned even from quick sketches on paper.

All the best,
Jonathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Justin.</p>
<p>Even with dedicated development resources and constraints on the architecture or tools (that will almost certainly be present once an application moves into actual implementation and beyond &#8216;version 1&#8242;), I think that the very nature of evolutionary development without some sort of up-front throw-away prototyping will miss opportunities for a better design.</p>
<p>Presenting and evaluating multiple alternatives can be very tricky when you&#8217;re building them into the application itself whereas a lot can be explored and learned even from quick sketches on paper.</p>
<p>All the best,<br />
Jonathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software Prototyping – Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve? by Justin McNeal</title>
		<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/software-prototyping-%e2%80%93-part-2-throw-away-or-evolve/175/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin McNeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/?p=175#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Good Article. I agree with everything that you&#039;ve stated. I am a big fan of throw-away prototypes, however if you have dedicated development resources, and an architecture that is constrained to a specific set of tools/languages, then an evolutionary prototype can be the best model. Keep the articles coming. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Article. I agree with everything that you&#8217;ve stated. I am a big fan of throw-away prototypes, however if you have dedicated development resources, and an architecture that is constrained to a specific set of tools/languages, then an evolutionary prototype can be the best model. Keep the articles coming. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software Prototyping – Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve? by Tweets that mention Software Prototyping – Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve? « Caretta Software Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/software-prototyping-%e2%80%93-part-2-throw-away-or-evolve/175/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Software Prototyping – Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve? « Caretta Software Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/?p=175#comment-97</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jan Jursa, brian_henderson. brian_henderson said: RT@IATV Good article: &quot;Software Prototyping – Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve?&quot; http://bit.ly/8JLB0f (carettasoftware.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jan Jursa, brian_henderson. brian_henderson said: RT@IATV Good article: &quot;Software Prototyping – Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve?&quot; <a href="http://bit.ly/8JLB0f" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8JLB0f</a> (carettasoftware.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software Prototyping – Part 2: Throw Away or Evolve? by Interesting Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/software-prototyping-%e2%80%93-part-2-throw-away-or-evolve/175/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carettasoftware.com/blog/?p=175#comment-33</guid>
		<description>It?s good to see you make postings on this topic, I have to bookmark this web site. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It?s good to see you make postings on this topic, I have to bookmark this web site. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
